Эта статья по- моему уже была, но я хочу обратить внимание на кумулятивную токсичность после повторных вакцинациях.

There are many ways in which this molecule could have been modifiedfor faster degradation in vivo. It is therefore noteworthy that this was not done—the vaccine was deliberately formulated with a compound that is degraded andeliminated from the body very slowly. Given that this lipid will most likely stay in ourtissues for months, we must expect cumulative toxicity with repeated vaccinations.

Механизм тут:

pdf : https://doctors4covidethics.org/the-pfizer-mrna-vaccine-ph...

Und warum sind die Länder mit den höchsten Covid-19-Todesraten auch die am meisten geimpften Länder?By the way, it’s a real stretch to call these hybrid injections, “vaccines”. They have about as much in common with a traditional vaccine as a python does with a coffee table. Nothing. The “vaccine” moniker was chosen in order to shore-up public confidence, that’s all. It’s part of a marketing strategy. There is no real similarity. The majority of people trust vaccines and see them as a shining example of medical achievement. The drug companies wanted to tap into that trust and use it for their own purposes. That’s why they called it a “vaccine” instead of “gene therapy” which more accurately describes ‘what it does.’ But–like we said– it’s just a marketing strategy.

https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/it-all-makes-sense-once-you-r...