This is not a statement but questions for discussion!

Attention - Poll!

Are all politicians—representatives of all countries and nations on our planet—by registering political parties in their own countries, including pro-communist ones, not defending the interests of their own country and nation? Could this be interpreted as protectionism? Because, of course, if successful, future political power, economic, and social relations will be built primarily in the party's country of registration. Subsequently, as history shows, communist parties, due to revisionism and opportunism, degenerated into national dictatorships, but previously, under the guise of "internationalism" or "liberation," they suppressed the national freedom of other nations and peoples. And people who identified themselves as representatives of another nation, nationality, or ethnic group but lived in a country where communist parties were registered, united by a conscious understanding of class struggle and internationalism, acted in the interests of the state and nation in their country of residence, and not only there, but also in countries where they lived, recognizing class struggle and internationalism within the framework of international organizations! For example, Stalin's Comintern, it turned out, involved representatives of other nations in the interests of a strong, but single, nation!???

Note: It is assumed that there will be a problem with registering a party as non-resident in a given country—and as not belonging to a given nation, that is, on the basis of non-identity.

Therefore, based on historical facts, it is assumed and provided to all interested parties this information as a survey on the future global political Marxist-Leninist party!